May 26, 2022
On Wednesday, my artist friend and I caught up on the first week of our retreat. We both were tired. In fact, Tuesday afternoon I had felt fatigued and unable to move and stretched out on my black futon for a couple of hours. I hadn’t attributed this exhaustion to immersion in the retreat till he mentioned it.
His retreat was going well. He had zoned in on this task early and his method had followed too. When he tacked up his newsprint to the easel and made his first charcoal marks his ‘gestures’ from four years of portrait drawing came back to him. Soon he expanded his process by deciding to learn a new portrait method each week. On our call he showed me the results from his own method and the new one he was studying, and we talked about processes and possible reasons for the differences in the images. My retreat was still unfocused, and I tried to gather some of what I had done and talk about it. I said I could not help dividing my attention between the writing retreat and karate, and that as usual was a problem, but besides that I was divided between the new creative non-fiction course I had begun and making notes about other things I wanted to write or learn to write about. I didn’t have time to add, 'Also I’ve been battling trolls,' as our call ended then.
After that first intense trolling experience. I decided to spend some time studying, it would be more honest to say baiting and thwarting, them last week. At first, I couldn’t articulate why.
In the past I had read comments on political articles to understand what the people of India were thinking. I cheered me that so many Indians saw through the propaganda of the ruling party and did not buy into the hate narratives they spread. It kept me connected to the people of my birth-land. I also laughed aloud, as some of the comments countering Hindutva trolls were clever and hilarious. They zoned in on the exact ‘blind-spot’ of the writer. When something infuriated me, I wrote a comment, but it was rare.
After the mean comments I encountered the previous week I entered the space with a different purpose. I wanted to study it — how it worked, who frequented it, what was said by whom, etc. The Hindutva arguments were very similar, almost word for word at times. They might have come from IT cell WhatsApp forwards. The counter comments varied. Few women entered this space. Women were trolled with sexual innuendo bordering on violation while men were not. Women’s comments were often attributed to lack of sexual satisfaction. If the trolls saw a Christian or Muslim name, they descended in droves and flooded responses. Nothing remotely resembling an intelligent or logical argument was made, just insults. Muslims were called rapist Mughals and Christians rice bags. Often the insults were returned, and it escalated quickly till the non-Hindu withdrew. Even here Hindutva numbers and domination was obvious.
I decided I would pick my battles, but once I commented on something I would keep going till the other person withdrew. Again, I am not sure why but I had to have the last word. The trolls didn’t like it. Their first response was often a comment to explain to a misguided old Hindu woman what the scene really was, but once they saw I had my own clear viewpoint they descended into insults. Slave of Mughals, of the Tukde-Tukde Congress, and even banana face were added to the names I have already mentioned last week.
It was exhausting but I used a strategy or several strategies. Later I realized they had parallels in dojo partner work practice. Sometimes I would counter a statement using facts that could not be disputed and that would stop any possible reply. E.g. When a man said 80% of country were behind Modi and the saffron agenda, I countered with the fact that his 2019 vote share was 38% so that couldn’t be true. This was analogous to the one blow to end the fight before it really began, that we train for in traditional karate. At times when I wanted to further the dialogue mainly to make a particular rejoiner, I would leave an opening for a counter from the first writer. This was akin to leaving the chest open if I wanted an attack there so I could counter with a favored technique. At times it was little jabs here and there, just playing to draw out the opponent and leave him completely unprotected — his arguments illogical and easy to break apart. Soon most trolls left me alone. It was a victory, but it wasn’t, not really.
The purpose for entering these frays should have been to create a soft and safe space, one where ideas could be exchanged so we could understand each other’s perspectives and begin to shift them. What I was doing was experimenting on how to shove others away, create and control my space, to dominate it so nobody could violate it. It is something we women do need to do in the real world too and I am glad I did it.
But this stopped any give and take, any real dialogue, any possibility of co-operation and middle ground. It only increased the polarization.
In the dojo when we do partner work it is with the intention of helping each other learn about our strengths and weaknesses so we can improve. It is never to overpower and show off our strength. When I had first started commenting I had hoped for intelligent and compassionate exchange but hadn’t found any. I was left hurting and sometimes scared. In the dojo it is possible to have this co-learning space because we trust each other. Will the same be possible in the real or ‘social media’ world?
Since I began learning karate whatever I learnt in the dojo helped me understand psychological dynamics within myself and within a relationship — whether it was contentious or harmonious. I often wonder if the wisdom of traditional karate can help in large group conflict transformation.
Any thoughts?